tirsdag den 23. september 2014

Welcome to the Participation for Development Workshop!

We are looking forward to an interesting workshop.


Based on the submissions of position papers to the workshop, we put together a very interesting program. We especially aimed at having enough time for discussion!

See you all in Windhoek!


Program

8.30 – 9.00 Welcome and Short Introduction

9.00 – 10.00 Four Presentations
Morning Tea
10.30 – 11.00 Two Presentations

11.00 – 12.00 Coffee table rounds: What is Development? And what is the role of ICT

Lunch

13.30 – 15.00 Five Presentations

16.00 –17.00 Coffee Table Rounds: PD, Participation, and Development

17.00 – 17.30 Evaluation and further initiatives


Indsendt af kl. Ingen kommentarer:

tirsdag den 22. juli 2014

Extension of deadline: Submission open until 28th of July

I

Position papers are submitted through the easychair website:
https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=participation4d


New: Important Dates

22 July   Abstract submitted to the easychair system
28 July   Submission deadline for position papers
30 July   Communication of acceptance
5 Aug     Early registration
5 Oct      Workshop
Indsendt af kl. Ingen kommentarer:

tirsdag den 8. juli 2014

Why Participation for Development at the PD conference

Why Participation for Development?
With the title ‘Participation for Development’, we aim at opining up for a discussion on the premises of both Participatory Design and ICT4D. What is participation? How does it look like in different contexts? What is the rationale behind involving participation? What is development? Designing with underprivileged communities challenge the assumptions around the objective of participatory design processes. Technology is but a means in this context. What is at stake is the where to and how of the development of livelihood. 
Development is often understood as bringing underprivileged communities up to the living standard of the high income countries. Development researchers have however for decades argued that the Western development trajectory is not a sustainable and desirable one. Not only the goals of development in underprivileged communities, but also life standards and technology development in and for the privileged countries are up for discussion. However, not introducing technology will not improve the situation either: The fast technology advances leave more and more people without access to technologies excluded from the digital connected global world (Heeks, 2009). This includes imbalances in physical access to technology as well as the resources and skills needed to effectively participate as a digital citizen (Mechal & Searle, 2010:44).  
‘Participation for Development’ points to a much-needed discussion in the so-called developed countries as well. The development in the currently low and middle income countries might point to alternatives that are valid in the high income countries as well, if the now as problematic recognised aspects of the privileged societies can be avoided. Understanding development as human development brings in unifying theories like the Capability Approach (Sen 1999) that can be applied similarly in countries of any level of income.It is then important to approach the co-design sessions as that of socially embedded action rather than transfer and diffusion, i.e. to acknowledge that something that already works somewhere cannot necessarily be transferred to work in the same way elsewhere (Avgerou, 2010).
 

Why at the Participatory Design Conference?

Participatory design in resource-restricted contexts is more complex because the users of the envisaged technology solution may have limited access to technology as well as to the design process. Careful planning is necessary to adapt the design methods and design probes to ensure active participation by all. Winschiers-Theophilus (2006) indicated that not only the result of design needs to be considered, taking the different cultural context into account; also the design process and the tools and methods need to be designed and adapted to fit to different cultural contexts. Furthermore, the gap between current technologies and the usage of ICT is often much wider than in e.g. in Scandinavian countries with a rather equal, highly educated and technology savvy population. This in turn requires the development of more comprehensive socio-technical prototypes, (Gonsalves et al. 2011) addressing not only the interfaces of the intended beneficaries but also the wider organisational context and socio-technical infrastructures, addressing issues like connectivity, economic sustainability, training possibilities, policies and legal regulation. Sustainability and capacity development needs to be thought into the development from the very beginning.

References

Avgerou, C. (2008). Discourses on ICT and development.  Information Technologies and International Development,  6(3), pp1-18 (2010)
Heeks, R. (2009). The ICT4D 2.0 Manifesto: Where next for ICTs and International Development? Working Paper Series, Paper No.42. Development Informatics Group. Institute for Development Policy and Management.
Mechael, P. & Searle, S., (2010). Barriers and Gaps Affecting mHealth in Low and Middle Income Countries : Policy White Paper. pp. 1-79.
Sen A (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Winschiers, Heike. "The Challenges of Participatory Design in a Intercultural Context: Designing for Usability in Namibia." PDC. 2006.

 
Indsendt af kl. Ingen kommentarer:

mandag den 7. juli 2014

Call for Participation


Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is more and more promoted as a driver and facilitator of economic growth and development in low and middle income countries. ICT for Development (ICT4D) though has mixed successes. Sustainability of solutions and usability respectively usefulness for the intended beneficiaries have been reported as causes. Participatory approaches to development have been proposed to address these causes. Participatory Design (PD) seems like a perfect fit. However, at the Participatory Design Conferences, research that addresses PD in low and middle income countries is rare. The workshop aims at bringing together the PD researchers working with under-privileged communities and attracting researchers from the ICT4D communities to the PD conference. The goal is to share experiences and start a discussion on how participation, ICT and development might relate.
 

Read more about why "Participation for Development" at the Participatory Design Conference 

  

Purpose and Intended Outcome

The workshop is meant to be a discussion forum for researchers working with participatory approaches in the context of ICT4D. We aim at bringing together researchers working with participatory design in ICT4D projects and compare experiences with Participation for Development. During the workshop, we plan to discuss how to promote the discussion on ‘Participation for Development’ in connection with the PD community and conference. This could e.g. be in form of a special issue for one of the relevant journals or an edited volume. 
 

How to participate

You are invited to submit a position paper of up to 5 pages. 
We especially encourage the presentation of concrete projects. 
Please, highlight the way the intended beneficiaries and other stakeholders contributed to the project and reflect on the dimensions of development - e.g. human, economical, and/or technical did benefit from the participation.
If your project didn't take a participatory approach, this fact and its implications could be subject to the position paper. 
If your project is still in a planning phase, feel free to map out the intended participation.

Position papers are submitted through the easychair website:
https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=participation4d

Important Dates

22 July   Submission deadline for position papers
28 July   Communication of acceptance
5 Aug     Early registration
5 Oct      Workshop

 

Organising Committee

Yvonne Dittrich, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, ydi(*)itu.dk
Retha De La Harpe, Cape Peninsula Univ. of Tech., South Africa, DeLaHarpeR(*)cput.ac.za
Mikko Korpela, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio Finland, mikko.korpela(*)uef.fi
Gertrudes Macueve, Univ. Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique, gertrum(*)gmail.com
Rahel Bekele, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, rahtesf(*)yahoo.com
Jens Kaasbøll, University of Oslo, Norway, jensj(*)ifi.uio.no
 

Indsendt af kl.
Abonner på: Opslag (Atom)